Contextual Influences on Work and Family Roles: Gender, Culture, and Socioeconomic Factors Authors

Introduction

At that place has been an increasing number of students aspiring to careers in STEM (science, engineering, engineering, and mathematics) in the last decade. The STEM workforce is also increasingly diversifying with respects to gender as female students outnumber male students in some Stalk fields, such as biology, medicine, and chemistry (Beede et al., 2011). Withal, females are even so underrepresented in engineering, computer science, and physical sciences (Chen and Ho, 2012). A multitude of reasons for the gender disparities in Stalk participation have been investigated, including gender differences in attitudes and behavior, such as the valuing of various STEM domains (Eccles et al., 1993; Ceci et al., 2014; Lauermann et al., 2015; Cheryan et al., 2017). One of the relevant underlying beliefs that might be driving gender differences in Stalk participation are traditional gender role beliefs. These general beliefs almost responsibilities and behaviors deemed advisable for women and men (Eccles, 1987; Williams and All-time, 1990) predict aspirations, choices, and occupational outcomes (Eccles et al., 1990). However, the long-term impact of traditional gender office beliefs on Stalk participation is less understood.

In the electric current study, we address this gap in research by investigating the long-term association of traditional gender-role beliefs in adolescence with subsequent educational and STEM occupational attainment in machismo for females and males using a longitudinal dataset spanning over 20 years. To explore the complexity of the impact of traditional gender role beliefs on these outcomes, we investigated the impact of traditional gender role beliefs within as well as across genders.

Understanding Gender Disparity in Stalk Fields

To better address the gender disparities beyond diverse Stem fields, the mechanisms behind its emergence need to be better understood. Research has shown that gender differences are evident in the valuing of gender-stereotyped domains such as mathematics and physics with males showing a stronger inclination toward typically male-stereotyped domains and vice versa for females (e.yard., Eccles et al., 1993). Similarly, the values underlying diverse career-related choices are often gendered. For case, females tend to value helping others, improving social club, and giving back to their communities relative to males and to other career values such as making lots of money (Lyson, 1984; Eccles, 1987; Konrad et al., 2000). This is consistent with their prevalent involvement in man services occupations (Lauermann et al., 2015). Males, on the other hand, are more than likely than females to value working with tools and machines and making lots of money, also as to aspire to careers within traditional male dominant Stem domains (Su et al., 2009; Wang and Degol, 2013; Ramaci et al., 2017).

According to the Eccles et al. (1983) Expectancy-Value theoretical framework, social and contextual factors (such as cultural values, gender role belief systems, social beliefs and behaviors, and prior aptitude and experiences) exert influence onto adolescents' self-beliefs, aspirations, choices, and attainment through their socialization experiences. Thus, gender differences in valuing and subsequent choices are likely results of internalized cultural values and social expectations linked to such belief systems every bit gender roles (see Eccles et al., 1983, 1990; Eccles, 2015).

Traditional Gender Office Beliefs and Educational and STEM Occupational Attainment

Amidst of import internalized social and cultural values are the general beliefs about responsibilities and behaviors deemed advisable for women and men (Eccles et al., 1983; Eagly, 1987; Williams and Best, 1990; Corrigall and Konrad, 2007): Individuals holding traditional gender role beliefs support women's role as the caretaker at dwelling house and in the family unit and men'due south role is to provide fiscal back up as the breadwinner of the family. Research has shown that traditional gender role beliefs are more strongly endorsed past men than women (Larsen and Long, 1988; Brewster and Padavic, 2000). These beliefs are linked to greater accent being put on men'south and husbands'/fathers' careers than on women's and wives/mothers' careers. Such behavior are then probable to be reflected in individual women'due south and men'south social identities, anticipated future social roles, and short-and long-term goals (Eccles and Bryan, 1994; Eccles et al., 1999). They are also key predictors of their aspirations and both educational and occupational choices (eastward.k., Schoon and Parsons, 2002; Webb et al., 2002).

Women who endorse traditional gender part behavior related to family and work roles are more than likely to focus on family unit responsibilities with consequences for the choices they make with regards to educational and occupational aspirations and attainment. For example, the decrease in traditional piece of work/family related gender function beliefs inside guild is likely related to increases in educational attainment for females (Buchmann et al., 2008). Female participation in higher education has increased as the prevalence of traditional family related gender role beliefs decreased over time (Brooks and Bolzendahl, 2004; Goldin, 2006). Furthermore, Scott (2004) found a straight link between traditional gender part beliefs and educational attainment: Using data from a National Panel study in Uk, females holding more traditional beliefs about family unit and work were more likely to prove worse operation in their high school exams than females non endorsing traditional beliefs. As expected, given the emphasis of the males' office as a breadwinner within the traditional gender role belief system, this association was not every bit pronounced for males.

By studies accept also shown associations of endorsement of traditional work/family related gender part beliefs with employment and earnings for females (Cassidy and Warren, 1996; Christie-Mizell, 2006; Corrigall and Konrad, 2007; Buchmann et al., 2008). For instance, Corrigall and Konrad (2007) found that women with more traditional attitudes in their early twenties worked fewer hours and had lower income than women with more egalitarian views in their late twenties using a large nationwide United States sample. In addition, Christie-Mizell (2006) found that endorsement of traditional gender function beliefs was most strongly associated with a decrease in income for white women compared to white and black men and black women within a large-scale longitudinal United states of america sample.

Although traditional gender role beliefs take get less prevalent over time (Bolzendahl and Myers, 2004; Brooks and Bolzendahl, 2004; Raley et al., 2006), these core beliefs most the roles of women and men in society might help explicate nevertheless existing differences in STEM occupational choices beyond gender. Co-ordinate to the Expectancy-Value theoretical framework (Eccles et al., 1983), links between gender function belief systems operate through the association of gender role beliefs with both individuals' gendered expectations for success in and the relative attainment values of diverse gender typed occupations. Thus, traditional gender role behavior probable bulldoze across gender differences in Stem-related occupational attainment. With males typically holding more than traditional gender part beliefs, they are more likely to seek out high status jobs and thus, pursue Stalk-related careers than females, in particular in the traditional Stem fields.

Nonetheless, the impact of traditional gender role behavior is likely to be fifty-fifty more complex and might be able to likewise explain within gender variation in Stalk occupational choices. Females are overrepresented in the medical, social, and life sciences, which business concern caring and helping others – a value typically endorsed by women with more than traditional work/family related gender role beliefs. Females' interest in these specific Stem fields may be due to the values they attach to these specific fields and the extent to which they identify with these values more than other science disciplines. Thus, a stronger endorsement of traditional work/family related gender role beliefs might exist perceived to exist in accord with the pursuit of STEM occupations in the life and medical sciences. In contrast, the more than traditional Stem fields, such as physics and engineering, are perceived as male person-dominated, isolated, and incompatible with the goals of helping others (Eccles et al., 1999; Cheryan et al., 2015). In other words, traditional gender role behavior should lead those females who go into STEM to be more than probable to go into careers in the medical and life sciences than into more traditional STEM fields. The extent to which traditional gender role behavior can assistance explain the unequal distribution of females and males in various Stem fields has non been investigated.

Previous inquiry, however, has shown that females with more traditional work/family unit related gender role beliefs are less likely than males to persist in STEM occupational aspirations than not-Stalk occupational aspirations. In a report using earlier waves of the MSALT dataset used in the present report, Frome et al. (1996) establish that traditional piece of work/family gender function beliefs held at age twenty were significantly associated with changes in Stem-related occupational aspirations for females. More specifically, they constitute that females with more traditional gender function beliefs were more likely to change from an occupational aspiration in math, engineering or physical science in 12th class to an occupational aspiration exterior of these fields at age 20. These links were non constitute for males. Given the wide variation of STEM and non-STEM careers that fit with male gender roles, the clan of traditional work/family unit related gender office beliefs with inside gender variation of occupational choices for males is likely to be less pronounced. Frome et al. (2006) found that the touch of traditional work/family related gender role behavior persisted for females in a follow-upward written report of a subsample of females that aspired to male-dominated occupational fields in twelfth grade. A higher desire for a family flexible job reported in 12th grade was associated with a change of aspirations away from male-dominated occupational fields past age 25.

In sum, gendered beliefs about suitable social roles inform both the pathways and opportunities that are perceived as accessible or socially desirable, as well equally the related educational and occupational choices that immature people make along the manner toward professional attainment. Even so, despite some exceptions (Frome et al., 1996; Corrigall and Konrad, 2007), more longitudinal studies investigating the long-term associations of traditional gender office beliefs are needed. In improver, there is a lack of studies investigating the associations of traditional gender function beliefs with gendered patterns of STEM-related occupational attainment using a differentiated conceptualization of traditional STEM fields and medical and life sciences.

Current Study

In the current written report, we accost these gaps in existing research by examining a developmental model spanning over 20 years investigating the association of traditional work/family unit related gender role behavior in boyhood with educational and STEM-related occupational attainment in adulthood. Furthermore, to accurately capture the representation of males and females in diverse Stem fields, we created and used a classification of Stem occupations that differentiates the archetype Stalk disciplines (i.e., physical sciences, engineering, mathematics, and technology, PMET) from the life and medical sciences (LS). In addition, to account for the touch of participants' socio-demographic family background, we included mother's educational background as a predictor of participant's educational and occupational attainment. Using a longitudinal dataset and building on piece of work from Frome et al. (1996), nosotros asked the following inquiry questions:

RQ1: To what extent practise traditional gender-part beliefs held in adolescence (age 16/xviii) predict subsequent educational and Stalk occupational attainment in adulthood (historic period 42) for females and males?

Taking into account the within gendered pattern of occupational choices institute in previous work past Frome et al. (1996), we first investigated the associations of traditional gender part beliefs and subsequent educational and STEM occupational attainment separately for male and female adolescents. Based on previous inquiry (e.chiliad., Scott, 2004), we hypothesized that stronger endorsements of traditional gender role behavior during adolescence would be associated with lower levels of didactics in adulthood (as measured past years of formal education) amongst females, merely not males. We hypothesized that stronger endorsement of traditional gender role beliefs in adolescence would exist associated with a reduced likelihood of occupational attainment inside male-typed STEM domains (i.e., PMET) compared to non-Stalk occupations amongst females, but non males. We likewise hypothesized that stronger endorsement of traditional gender role beliefs in boyhood would increment the likelihood to be in less male-typed Stalk domains (i.e., LS) compared to non-Stalk careers. Lastly, we hypothesized that traditional gender role beliefs in adolescence would decrease the likelihood of occupational attainment in less male-typed STEM domains (i.e., LS) relative to male person-typed Stem domains (i.e., PMET).

RQ2: Are gender differences in educational and STEM occupational attainment in machismo (age 42) mediated by traditional gender function beliefs in boyhood (historic period 16/18)?

Nosotros hypothesized that beyond gender differences in educational and Stalk occupational attainment will be mediated by traditional gender function beliefs. Given previous research (Brewster and Padavic, 2000), we hypothesized that males will concur more traditional gender role beliefs than females. Thus, we hypothesized that gender differences in the endorsement of traditional gender role beliefs by males than females will explain differences in rates of educational attainment and Stem-related occupational attainment between males and females. More specifically, we hypothesized that stronger endorsement of traditional gender office beliefs by males will explain a higher rate of attainment of PMET-related compared to non-Stem occupations. In contrast, we hypothesized that a college rate of attainment of LS-related compared to non-STEM occupations of females will exist explained by males' college levels of traditional gender function behavior. The aforementioned holds true for the comparing of LS-related and non-STEM related careers.

Materials and Methods

Sample

The electric current study used information from the big scale longitudinal Michigan Written report of Boyish and Adult Life Transitions (MSALT) that followed ii,474 participants over a time span of 30 years from the end of elementary school at age 11 into adulthood at age 42. Participants were from largely middle-income communities located within a large industrial Midwestern city in Michigan, United states of america and largely from European American descent (91%). We used parent reported data from Wave ane (participants in course 6/age 12) and participant self-reported data from Waves 5 and half dozen (grade 10/age sixteen and grade 12/age 18), and Wave ten (age 42). In Wave 10, data was nerveless through surveys via mail, via phone interviews and via spider web search using social media profiles (i.e., LinkedIn, Facebook). For participants located through web search, educational and occupational attainment was assessed using the information presented in online profiles. All Wave 10 participants with valid data for occupational attainment were included in the current report (n = 744; 58% female; 93% European American). This subsample constituted 89% of the overall Wave 10 sample and 30% of the original sample. Attrition analyses using the original sample of 2,474 participants showed that Wave 10 participants differed significantly from the participants that had dropped out of the study: The Wave 10 sample had a significantly higher rate of females than the original sample [t(ii,470) = three.435, p = 0.001], participants reported significantly lower levels of traditional gender beliefs at age 16/eighteen [t(1,840) = 3.240, p = 0.001], and their mothers reported significantly higher educational background [t(ane,927) = -6.524, p = 0.000].

Measures

All measures were assessed using survey questionnaires. Up to Wave 6 of data collection, participants received and filled out surveys at school. Parents filled out surveys at home. In Moving ridge ten, surveys were mailed to prior participants. In improver, four percent of Wave 10 data were collected through phone interviews and 33 percentage of Wave 10 were collected via web search.

Traditional Gender Part Beliefs

Participants' traditional gender role beliefs with regards to job responsibilities were assessed at Wave 5 (age sixteen) and Wave 6 (age 18) with a five-item calibration (α = 0.83/0.80, e.1000., "It is usually ameliorate for anybody involved if the human being is the achiever outside the home and the woman takes care of the abode and family unit," see Appendix A). This scale assesses behavior about the relative importance of a man's vs. a woman'due south career and beliefs about better dispositions of men for career success. The scale was developed by Eccles et al. (1983) and validated in previous studies (Belansky et al., 1993; Frome et al., 1996). Students rated items on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from one = Disagree to 7 = Agree. To minimize missing information, missing students' reports from Wave 6 were supplemented by Moving ridge v reports.

Participants' Educational Attainment

At Wave x (age 42) participants reported their highest attained educational level (Range: 1 = "12th class or less" to 10 = "Doctorate degree"). For Wave x participants that were located through spider web search, data was coded using available information.

Maternal Educational Attainment

Participants' mothers were asked to report their highest attained educational level at Moving ridge 1 (Range: ane = "Form school" to 9 = "Ph.D or professional degree"). In improver, participants were asked to report their mother'south educational level at Wave 5 (age 16) with responses ranging from 1 = Grade school to 6 = Graduate school. To minimize missing data, parents' reports from Moving ridge one were converted to the 1–6 response scale and supplemented by Wave 5 student reports.

Participants' Occupational STEM Attainment

At Wave 10 (age 42) participants were asked to study their current occupation. If participants were not currently working, they were asked to report their most recent occupation (north = 75).

For the present analyses, the open-ended answers were get-go coded using employment classification standards set past the Us Bureau of Labor Statistics and the 2010 standard occupational classification (SOC) organization manual (U.South. Agency of Labor Statistics, 2010). Next, SOC-coded occupations were farther coded for Stem using U.S. Department of Labor's Stem classification recommendations and subsequently complanate to three categories to capture the type of STEM-relatedness: traditional STEM-related careers in the physical sciences, applied science, mathematics, computing and technology (PMET; e.g., engineers, surveyors, and mapping scientists, mathematical scientists, physicists, and astronomers, etc); LS (e.one thousand., biological science, health sciences, LS; e.g., biologist, concrete therapists, nurses, dentists, and veterinarians, etc); and non-Stem. The categorization of non-Stalk occupations was guided by our research question and therefore comprised occupations in the social sciences as well all other occupations (including legislators, chief executives and full general administrators, teachers, social workers, homemaker, etc). Iii dichotomized indicator variables for each of the STEM categories (LS, PMET, and Not-Stalk) indicating membership in the respective category (e.g., ane = LS-related occupation) were computed.

Statistical Analyses

To investigate the longitudinal associations of traditional gender role beliefs in boyhood with occupational and educational Stalk attainment in adulthood for females and males, multi-group manifest path analyses by gender were conducted. In addition, we used the model comparison approach advocated by Judd et al. (1995, 2009) in our analyses, which encourages the use of specific focused comparisons to test specific theoretically derived comparisons. In this case, we conducted three separate path models comparing the different types of STEM-related careers using the following pair comparisons: LS vs. non-Stem, PMET vs. non-Stalk, and LS vs. PMET. These comparisons not only immune united states to compare the differentiated STEM careers with not-Stalk careers, but too with each other. In the models, educational attainment and STEM occupational attainment in machismo (Wave x, age 42) were regressed on traditional gender office beliefs in adolescence (Waves 5 and vi, ages 16 and xviii). Educational attainment also predicted STEM occupational attainment. To take into account participants' educational family unit background, mother's educational attainment was included in the model every bit a covariate of educational attainment and Stalk occupational attainment in adulthood. To accost the associations with dichotomous Stem categories (LS, PMET and non-Stalk), logistic regressions path analyses were estimated using mixture modeling in MPlus 7.ane (Muthén and Muthén, 2013). Divide models for females and males were estimated using the KNOWNCLASS option in MPlus. To address missing information (≤14%), models were estimated using maximum likelihood estimation with robust standard errors as well equally Montecarlo integration (Muthén and Muthén, 2013).

To investigate whether gender differences in educational and Stem occupational attainment were mediated by traditional gender role beliefs, separate mediation path analyses were conducted for each of the four outcomes of interest (educational attainment, LS vs. non-STEM, PMET vs. non-Stem and LS vs. PMET). For each set of analyses, gender was used to predict the outcome to test for existing gender differences in a first step. So, a path model was estimated, in which gender and traditional gender part beliefs predict the outcome. In addition, gender predicted traditional gender role behavior. In guild for mediation to exist met, four weather condition had to be met: Showtime, gender must be related to the issue. 2nd, gender must be related to traditional gender role beliefs. Third, traditional gender office beliefs should be a significant predictor of the outcome. 4th, gender should no longer significantly predict the outcome. If all iv weather are met, total arbitration is supported. If only the kickoff three conditions are met, partial mediation is supported (Hayes, 2009). To examination for the significance of the indirect effect of gender on the result via traditional gender part beliefs, the MODEL INDIRECT command in Mplus was used. In addition, models were estimated in Mplus using maximum likelihood estimation likewise as Montecarlo integration to accost missing data and dichotomous outcome variables (Muthén and Muthén, 2013).

Results

Descriptive analyses revealed gender differences in the endorsement of traditional gender role beliefs and educational attainment (see Table 1). Female person participants reported lower endorsement of the traditional gender role behavior scale [t(638) = -xiii.610, p = 0.000] in boyhood and higher educational attainment [t(689) = ii.964, p = 0.003] in machismo than male participants. The bulk of participants were engaged in non-Stalk occupations (n = 511, 61%) followed by PMET-related (n = 147, 18%) and LS-related occupations (n = 87, 10%). As shown in Figure 1, gender differences in the distribution emerged. Females were more likely than males to be in LS- related occupations in adulthood [t(742) = half dozen.328, p = 0.000], whereas males were more likely than females to be in PMET-related occupations [t(742) = -4.422, p = 0.000].

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for relevant study variables.

Figure 1. Distribution of Stalk-related careers past gender.

Table 2 presents correlations of traditional gender role behavior, educational and occupational attainment, and their mother's educational attainment separately for males and females. Some gender differences in correlation patterns were evident. For females, traditional gender function behavior were statistically significantly negatively associated with their mothers' educational attainment and their own educational attainment as adults. Traditional gender role beliefs among females were also statistically significantly negatively associated with beingness in a PMET-related occupation, only positively associated with being in a non-STEM occupation. Employment inside a LS-related occupation (vs. whatever other occupation) was not associated with traditional gender part beliefs. Females' educational attainment in adulthood was positively associated with their female parent's educational attainment and employment in LS- or PMET-related occupations; and negatively associated with being in non-Stem-related occupations. For males, traditional gender role behavior were also statistically significantly negatively associated with their mother's educational attainment. Educational attainment in adulthood showed the same correlation pattern every bit for females: It was positively correlated with mother's educational attainment and employment in a LS- or PMET-related occupation, but negatively correlated with employment in a non-Stalk occupation.

Table two. Bivariate correlations of relevant variables by gender.

Traditional Gender Part Behavior Predicting Subsequent Educational and STEM Occupational Attainment

Figures 2–4 present the results of the multi-group path analyses past gender for each of the STEM category comparisons in our exam of the long-term associations of traditional gender role beliefs with educational and occupational STEM attainment (RQ1).

Figure 2. Results of multi-group path analyses past gender for LS-related careers vs. non-STEM careers. (A) Results for females and (B) results for males. Standardized coefficients are shown for continuous variables. OR, Odds Ratio. 95% Confidence intervals in brackets. Confidence intervals excluding 0/ane for regression coefficients/odds ratios betoken statistical significance.

Educational Attainment

With regards to participants' educational attainment the following pattern was plant beyond all three models (see Figures 2–4): For females, traditional gender role behavior were significantly negatively associated with mother's educational attainment and with their own educational attainment in adulthood. In other words, female person participants that endorsed stronger traditional gender role beliefs were more than likely to take mothers with lower educational attainment and also more likely to reach lower levels of education themselves. Moreover, their educational attainment was statistically significantly and positively associated with their mother's educational attainment. In other words, females were more than likely to achieve a college caste of education when their mothers were also more highly educated. For males, traditional gender office behavior were marginally negatively associated with mother's educational attainment. Mother'south educational attainment was also statistically significantly positively associated with males' ain educational attainment in adulthood. However, traditional gender role behavior were not statistically associated with educational attainment in adulthood for males.

Stem-Related Occupational Attainment

With regards to attainment of LS-related occupations in comparison to non-Stalk occupations (see Figure 2), traditional gender role beliefs were not associated with attainment of a LS-related occupation for either males or females after taking into account their educational attainment. Educational attainment was statistically significantly associated with a higher likelihood to be in a LS-related career for females, simply non males.

With regards to attainment of PMET-related occupations in comparing to non-Stem occupations (see Figure 3), females with more traditional gender role beliefs in adolescence were statistically significantly less probable to exist employed in PMET-related careers as adults after controlling for their educational attainment. For males, no statistically significant clan of traditional gender function behavior with the likelihood to be in PMET-related careers was found. Higher educational attainment statistically significantly increased the likelihood for beingness in a PMET-related career for males and females.

Figure 3. Results of multi-grouping path analyses by gender for PMET-related careers vs. non-Stem careers. (A) Results for females and (B) results for males. Standardized coefficients are shown for continuous variables. OR, Odds Ratio. 95% Confidence intervals in brackets. Confidence intervals excluding 0/one for regression coefficients/odds ratios indicate statistical significance.

With regards to attainment of LS-related occupations in comparison to PMET-related occupations (run across Figure iv), traditional gender role beliefs statistically significantly increased the likelihood of being in a LS-related career instead of a PMET-related career for females. However, college educational attainment significantly decreased the likelihood of being in a Not-STEM related career for females. The likelihood of being in a LS- vs. a PMET-related occupation was not associated with endorsements of traditional gender role beliefs for males. Moreover, higher educational attainment did not significantly predict the likelihood of being in a LS- vs. a PMET related occupation for either gender.

Figure four. Results of multi-group path analyses by gender for LS-related careers vs. PMET-related careers. (A) Results for females and (B) results for males. Standardized coefficients are shown for continuous variables. OR, Odds Ratio. 95% Confidence intervals in brackets. Confidence intervals excluding 0/i for regression coefficients/odds ratios signal statistical significance.

Gender Part Beliefs as Mediators of Gender Differences in Educational and Stalk Occupational Attainment

To examine whether traditional gender role beliefs explain the gender differences in educational and Stalk occupational attainment, divide arbitration path analyses were conducted for each of the relevant outcomes (RQ2). Gender was significantly related to all outcomes: Males were more likely to be in a PMET-related career in comparison to a not-Stalk career [OR = 1.86, 95% CI (one.28, two.70)]. In contrast, females were more than likely to exist in a LS-related career compared to a non-Stem career [OR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.09, 0.34)] as well equally when compared to a PMET-related career [OR = 0.09, 95% CI (0.05, 0.20)]. Females also had more than years of schooling than males [b = -0.xi, 95% CI (-0.19, -0.04)].

For educational attainment (see Figure 5A), gender differences in educational attainment were fully mediated by traditional gender office beliefs, as the association of gender and educational attainment was no longer significant after including traditional gender role behavior as the mediator. In addition, results indicated that the indirect effect was pregnant [b = -0.10, 95% 95% CI (-0.14, -0.05)].

Figure 5. Results of path analyses investigating the mediation of the association of gender with educational and Stalk occupational attainment outcomes via traditional gender role beliefs. Gender coded 1, male. (A) Results for educational attainment, (B) results for comparison of LS-related vs. not-Stem related careers, (C) results for comparison fo PMET-related vs. not-Stem related careers, and (D) results for comparison of LS-related vs. PMET-related careers. Standardized coefficients are shown for continuous variables. OR, Odds Ratio. 95% Confidence intervals in brackets. Confidence intervals excluding 0/1 for regression coefficients/odds ratios indicate statistical significance.

Gender differences in the likelihood to be in a LS-related career vs. a not-STEM career were non statistically significantly mediated by traditional gender role beliefs (run into Figure 5B). The association between gender and endorsement of a LS-related career remained significant after including traditional gender role beliefs in the model and no significant association of traditional gender role beliefs with LS-related career attainment was found. Thus, the indirect effect was not pregnant [OR = 0.92, 95% CI (0.64, i.xx)].

All the same, gender differences in the likelihood to be in PMET-related career vs. a not-STEM career were partially mediated by traditional gender role beliefs (see Figure 5C). The higher likelihood of males to be in a PMET-related career remained statistically significant after the inclusion of traditional gender function behavior in the model, but results indicated a statistically pregnant indirect effect [OR = 0.76; 95% CI (0.61, 0.92)].

Lastly, gender differences in the likelihood to be in a LS- vs. a PMET-related occupation were not mediated by traditional gender part beliefs (see Figure 5D). The college likelihood of females to exist in a LS-related career remained statistically significant after the inclusion of traditional gender function beliefs in the model and no meaning association of traditional gender part behavior and LS-related vs. PMET-related attainment was institute. Thus, the indirect issue was not statistically meaning [OR = 1.43, 95% CI (0.87, 1.99)].

Give-and-take

The current study investigated the affect of traditional work/family related gender role behavior in adolescence on educational and STEM occupational attainment in adulthood using a longitudinal dataset spanning 20 years. As an important determinant of life choices, traditional piece of work/family related gender role beliefs were used to investigate impacts on educational and occupational attainment in PMET, LS, and not-Stalk occupational attainment within and across gender. By doing so, we fill a need for longitudinal studies on the touch of traditional gender office beliefs as well as address the lack of Stalk differentiation when investigating its impact on gendered occupational choices in previous enquiry. This is peculiarly noteworthy given the misrepresentation of women in Stalk when LS occupations and PMET occupations are non differentiated. Past highlighting these differentiated associations we can improve contribute to the conversation of how we tin better represent and support females' STEM-related choices.

Impacts of Traditional Gender Role Beliefs on Subsequent Educational and STEM Occupational Attainment Within Gender

Our investigation of the impact of traditional work/family related gender part beliefs revealed a nuanced pattern of findings for females. As hypothesized, females with stronger traditional gender function beliefs in adolescence attained lower levels of education in adulthood – a finding that further supports previous work by Scott (2004). 1 explanation for this association could exist that the endorsement of traditional gender roles during boyhood (due east.g., behavior about women'due south role as the flagman at home and in the family) may be a reflection of young women's expectations for marriage and child begetting early on and their reliance on men's role to provide financial support as the breadwinner of the family. If and then, this explanation would be in congruence with findings past Corrigall and Konrad (2007) that constitute that women with more traditional attitudes worked fewer hours and had lower income than women with more egalitarian views in their late twenties.

By using a differentiated classification of Stem-related occupations, we besides establish, as hypothesized, that females' endorsement of traditional gender office beliefs in adolescence reduced the likelihood of occupational employment within PMET domains, but was not associated with their occupational attainment within LS domains. In improver, more than traditional gender role beliefs actually predicted occupational attainment within LS domains over PMET domains. The reduced likelihood of occupational attainment in a PMET domain amongst females that endorse traditional gender office beliefs lends further back up to enquiry that has documented male and female person value of gender-stereotyped domains in alignment with their corresponding gender (e.yard., Eccles et al., 1993). Still, our nuanced findings with regards to the furnishings on occupational attainment in PMET- and LS-related careers underline the importance of using a differentiated conceptualization of Stalk domains. Endorsement of traditional gender role beliefs did non affect females' occupational attainment in LS domains negatively. Thus, to truly capture and understand the origins of gender differentiation in the STEM field, a broader conceptualization of Stem-related occupations that is fully inclusive of LS such equally wellness and medicine is needed. This will not only let for a better telescopic of Stalk-related or, more broadly speaking, science-related occupations, just it will besides more accurately represent the participation of women in STEM.

However, it is important to note that our models accounted for females' educational attainment in adulthood; and for females, their endorsement of traditional gender office beliefs were negatively associated with their educational attainment. It may be that there is an indirect link betwixt traditional gender role beliefs and STEM-typed occupational attainment that is mediated past educational attainment. This might be especially relevant equally STEM occupations generally require a higher caste of educational attainment and technical preparation relative to not-Stem occupations.

Traditional gender role beliefs did not significantly associate with educational or STEM-related occupational attainment for male participants. Still, interestingly, associations of traditional gender office beliefs and Stem occupational attainment were in the like direction as for females, pointing to a similar pattern of bear on for males as for females, only less pronounced. Peculiarly with regards to STEM-related occupational attainment, one reason for the non-significance of the effects for males might be the small-scale sample size of males in LS-related careers. It too needs to be noted that coefficients for females and males were not statistically significantly dissimilar from each other.

Gender Differences in Educational and STEM Occupational Attainment: Impact of Traditional Gender Role Behavior

Our investigation of whether traditional work/family unit related gender role beliefs are related to across gender differences revealed that gender differences in the endorsement of traditional gender role beliefs explain differences in the rates of educational attainment and STEM-related occupational attainment of males and females. More than specifically, as expected higher educational attainment by females was mediated by lower endorsement of traditional gender function beliefs past females. In improver, equally expected stronger endorsement of traditional gender part behavior by males partially explained a higher rate of attainment of PMET-related careers compared to non-STEM careers. Even so, gender differences in attainment of LS-related occupations in comparing to non-STEM occupations and PMET-related occupations were non mediated past traditional gender role beliefs. The found effects were, even so, in the expected management and might have been afflicted by the low sample size of males in LS occupations in the current sample. Thus, in accord with the Expectancy-Value theoretical framework (Eccles et al., 1983), our study provides some evidence that traditional gender role beliefs are ane potential underlying psychological factor that tin assist explain gender disparity in attainment. This finding further highlights that information technology is important to have a differentiated conceptualization of Stem occupations, as STEM occupations encompass a diverseness of occupations with differential values attached to them by males and females.

Given our findings, one potential way to accost the existing gender disparity in the traditional Stalk fields could exist to better contextualize the human being applications of these fields to attract more females. Information technology would be equally prudent to address the stereotype of PMET-related occupations every bit male person-typed domains, that are isolating and incompatible with the goals of helping others (Cheryan et al., 2015). This might be deterring females from aspiring to such occupations. On the other hand, our findings indicate that changes in the socialization of societal gendered expectations with a movement to more than egalitarian gender role beliefs, every bit currently ongoing (Brooks and Bolzendahl, 2004), will ultimately help ease gender disparities in educational and Stalk occupational attainment.

Limitations and Future Research

While the longitudinal dataset used in the present study immune for an investigation of the long-term impact of traditional gender role beliefs, it needs to exist kept in mind that the present longitudinal sample was biased toward lower levels of traditional gender role beliefs due to attrition. As a result, the nowadays report did not present the full variation in traditional gender function beliefs that likely exist in the full general population. Our present sample was also biased toward having mothers with a higher level of education. Our results, thus, do non represent the total spectrum with regards to participant'south socioeconomic background. Given these constraints with regards to variation in traditional gender office beliefs and socio-economic groundwork, our findings likely underestimate the effects of traditional gender role beliefs on educational and Stalk occupational choices. Lastly, the present sample also consisted of a college rate of females than males due to attrition. Equally a effect, the sample size for private Stalk categories (e.g., LS) was minor for male person participants. This means that these detail findings need to be interpreted with caution due to the lack of ability. To address the bias in our present sample, hereafter research should replicate the findings using a more gender balanced sample capturing effectively the whole spectrum of traditional gender role beliefs, Stem occupations, and socio-economic backgrounds to exam generalizability.

Our findings illustrate how general beliefs almost societal norms, i.due east., traditional gender role beliefs, can affect specific life choices in important life domains, i.e., educational and occupational attainment. Our findings did, all the same, not look into the educational and occupational trajectories of the participants to see how educational and occupational aspirations and choices developed over fourth dimension. This important future avenue for research would allow united states of america to better understand the educational and occupational pathways taken by females and males. Such analyses might shine a light on whether females and males differ in the timing or variation of educational and occupational choices, which might, in turn, bear upon their eventual educational, and occupational attainment.

Future research should likewise examine the mechanisms through which traditional gender role beliefs affect educational and occupational choices. As previously discussed, traditional gender role beliefs are probable to inform valuing of didactics and particular Stalk domains, which, in turn, determine occupational choices (Wigfield and Eccles, 2000). They might also inform gender-specific stereotypes about women'south lack of competencies in Stem majors and occupations, which take been constitute to negatively influence STEM choices for women (Nosek and Smyth, 2011; Cundiff et al., 2013). These possible means through which traditional gender role beliefs might differentially bear upon educational and occupational choices for females and males, especially in Stem, need to exist empirically tested.

In improver, apart from exploring the processes driving the bear on of traditional gender office behavior on career choices, future analyses should explore how other important life choices (due east.yard., marriage, children) mediate or moderate the impact of traditional gender role beliefs on educational and occupational attainment. More importantly, particularly life choices with regards to the timing of marriage and kid begetting very likely affect educational and occupational pathways differentially for females and males. As such, another meaning avenue of research will also be to examine actual, and perceived, opportunities for employment and lifestyle affordances (i.e., number of hours worked, work-life residual) of STEM-related domains past men and women that could contribute to gender-differentiated choices and pathways equally a function of their gender function beliefs. For example, women might gravitate more toward LS-typed careers if at that place are a greater number of opportunities for work in non-academic settings as opposed to traditional science domains (Ceci et al., 2014). Research is beginning to examine the congruence of perceived affordances and desired goals in explaining gender-differentiated Stem occupational choices (e.thousand., Diekman et al., 2016). It will exist imperative to continue this avenue of inquiry and examine how gender roles behavior inform a socially constructed narrative of perceived abilities, affordances, and anticipated goals and resultant choices, if we are to support continued opting into these Stem fields.

Overall, our findings showcase the importance of culturally socialized general beliefs about society, in this example traditional work/related gender role beliefs, in influencing the specific life choices women and men make, and specifically their potential in explaining disparate gender participation in STEM.

Ethics Statement

This written report was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Institutional Review Board of the Academy of Michigan and the University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, Us with written informed consent from all subjects. Written informed consent for subjects under the age of sixteen was obtained from parents. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Michigan and the University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Author Contributions

A-LD and NS conceived the idea of the study. JE was the architect of the data used in the study. A-LD conducted the analyses and wrote the manuscript with feedback and assist from NS and JE.

Funding

This inquiry was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (# BNS 85-10504 and # 1108778), the National Institute of Mental Health (# MH31724), and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (# HD17296) to JE.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed every bit a potential conflict of involvement.

References

Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., and Doms, Yard. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Event Brief No. 04-eleven. Bachelor at: https://ssrn.com/abstruse=1964782 (accessed November xv, 2018).

Belansky, E. Southward., Early, D. Yard., and Eccles, J. S. (1993). "The impact of mothers and peers on adolescents' gender office traditionality and plans for the future," in Poster Session Presented at the Coming together of the Society for Research on Child Development, New Orleans, LA.

Google Scholar

Bolzendahl, C. I., and Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Soc. Forces 83, 759–789. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0005

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Brewster, One thousand. L., and Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996:the contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. J. Spousal relationship Fam. 62, 477–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00477.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brooks, C., and Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender function attitudes: cohort replacement, social-structural modify, and ideological learning. Soc. Sci. Res. 33, 106–133. doi: ten.1016/S0049-089X(03)00041-3

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., and McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 34, 319–337. doi: x.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cassidy, M. Fifty., and Warren, B. O. (1996). Family employment condition and gender function attitudes: a comparing of women and men higher graduates. Gend. Soc. ten, 312–329. doi: 10.1177/089124396010003007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. Yard., Kahn, Southward., and Williams, West. M. (2014). Women in academic science: a irresolute landscape. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest xv, 75–141. doi: x.1177/1529100614541236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., and Ho, P. (2012). Stem in Postsecondary Education: Archway, Compunction, and Coursetaking Among 2003–04 Kickoff Postsecondary Students (NCES 2013-152). Washington, DC: National Centre for Education Statistics.

Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Primary, A., and Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls' interest in information science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Front. Psychol. 6:49. doi: x.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Christie-Mizell, C. A. (2006). The effects of traditional family and gender credo on earnings: race and gender differences. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 27, 48–71. doi: x.1007/s10834-005-9004-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corrigall, E. A., and Konrad, A. G. (2007). Gender role attitudes and careers: a longitudinal study. Sex Roles 56, 847–855. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9242-0

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Cundiff, J. 50., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., and Lo, L. (2013). Do gender–science stereotypes predict scientific discipline identification and science career aspirations amongst undergraduate science majors? Soc. Psychol. Educ. xvi, 541–554. doi: x.1007/s11218-013-9232-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., Steinberg, Thousand., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., and Clark, E. One thousand. (2016). A goal congruity model of part entry, engagement, and leave: understanding communal goal processes in Stalk gender gaps. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21, 142–175. doi: ten.1177/1088868316642141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Beliefs: A social-part estimation. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's accomplishment-related decisions. Psychol. Women Q. 11, 135–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S. (2015). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol. 7, 116–132.

Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. G., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). "Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors," in Achievement and Achievement Motivation, ed. J. T. Spence (San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman), 75–146.

Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S., Hairdresser, B., and Jozefowicz, D. (1999). "Linking gender to educational, occupational, and recreational choices: applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices," in Sexism and Stereotypes in Modern Society: The Gender Scientific discipline of Janet Taylor Spence, eds W. B. Swann, J. H. Langlois, and L. A. Gilbert (Washington, DC: American Psychological Clan), 153–192. doi: 10.1037/10277-007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eccles, J. Southward., and Bryan, J. (1994). "Adolescence: critical crossroad in the path of gender-office development," in Gender Roles Through the Life Span, ed. M. R. Stevenson (Muncie: Ball State University Press), 110–147.

Google Scholar

Eccles, J. Due south., Jacobs, J. Eastward., and Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. J. Soc. Issues 46, 183–201. doi: x.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: the impact of phase-surround fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. Am. Psychol. 48, ninety–101. doi: ten.1037/0003-066x.48.2.xc

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., and Barber, B. L. (2006). Why don't they desire a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who inverse their occupational aspirations. Educ. Res. Eval. 12, 359–372. doi: x.1080/13803610600765786

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frome, P. M., Alfeld-Liro, C. J., and Eccles, J. S. (1996). Why don't immature women want to pursue male-typed occupational aspirations? A test of competing hypotheses. Paper Presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Order for Inquiry on Adolescence, Boston, MA. doi: 10.1080/13803610600765786

CrossRef Full Text

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Across baron and kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 76, 408–420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Judd, C., McClelland, G., and Ryan, C. (2009). Information Analysis: A Model Comparison Approach. New York, NY: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., and Culhane, S. E. (1995). Data analysis: continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46, 433–465. doi: ten.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.002245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Konrad, A., Ritchie, J. E., Lieb, P., and Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 126, 593–641. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.593

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larsen, Chiliad. S., and Long, East. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: traditional or egalitarian? Sexual activity Roles 19, 1–12. doi: ten.1007/BF00292459

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Lauermann, F., Grub, A., and Eccles, J. Due south. (2015). Differential effects of adolescents' expectancy and value beliefs about math and english on math/science-related and man services-related career plans. Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol. seven,205–228.

Google Scholar

Lyson, T. A. (1984). Sex differences in the choice of a male person or female career line: an analysis of background characteristics and piece of work values. Work Occup. 11, 131–146. doi: ten.1177/0730888484011002001

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Muthén, L. Thousand., and Muthén, B. O. (2013). Mplus user'southward Guide, 7th Edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Google Scholar

Nosek, B. A., and Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math engagement and achievement. Am. Educ. Res. J. 48, 1125–1156. doi: 10.3102/0002831211410683

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raley, South. B., Mattingly, Grand. J., and Bianchi, South. M. (2006). How dual are dual-income couples? documenting alter from 1970 to 2001. J. Marriage Fam. 68, 11–28. doi: x.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00230.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramaci, T., Pellerone, M., Ledda, C., Presti, G., Squatrito, V., and Rapisarda, 5. (2017). Gender stereotypes in occupational choice: a cross-sectional study on a group of Italian adolescents. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. x, 109–117. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S134132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schoon, I., and Parsons, S. (2002). Teenage aspirations for time to come careers and occupational outcomes. J. Vocat. Behav. lx, 262–288. doi: x.1006/JVBE.2001.1867

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, R., Rounds, J., and Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychol. Bull. 135, 859–884. doi: x.1037/a0017364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

U.Southward. Agency of Labor Statistics (2010). Standard Occupational Nomenclature User Guide. Washington, DC: U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Google Scholar

Wang, M.-T., and Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in Stem fields. Dev. Rev. 33, 304–340. doi: 10.1016/J.DR.2013.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Webb, R. K., Lubinski, D., and Benbow, C. P. (2002). Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: new perspectives on their educational and vocational development. J. Educ. Psychol. 94, 785–794. doi: ten.1037/0022-0663.94.4.785

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, J. East., and All-time, D. L. (1990). Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Multination Written report (Rev. ed.). Yard Oaks, CA: Sage.

Google Scholar

Appendix A

Traditional Gender Part Belief Scale

In general, men are more than reliable on the chore than women.

In general, men are naturally more competitive than women.

It bothers me to come across a man existence told what to practise by a woman.

Men are naturally improve than women at mechanical things.

Information technology is usually better for anybody involved if the human is the achiever outside the home and the adult female takes care of the dwelling and family.

moyercaltin.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01053/full

Share this post